Researching with people you know: Issues in interviewing
Tracy McConnell-Henry
School of Nursing and Midwifery,
Monash University, Gippsland Campus
Churchill
VIC, Australia
Ainsley James
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Gippsland Campus
Churchill
VIC, Australia
Ysanne Chapman
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Gippsland Campus, Churchill VIC, Australia
Karen Francis
Professor of Rural Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Gippsland Campus, Churchill VIC
PP: 2 - 9
Abstract
Interviewing is a key strategy used to elicit data in qualitative research. Whilst many nurse researchers are cognizant of the skills required to conduct a successful research interview, researchers may be less comfortable with the notion of interviewing a participant with whom the researcher claims a pre-existing, or dual relationship; a phenomenon becoming more apparent as the volume of researchers escalates especially in rural settings or smaller, heavily specialized fields. Issues pertaining to this particular situation are analyzed, debated and discussed. Furthermore tactics designed to enhance the research process whilst upholding the well-being of the researcher will be illustrated and elucidated.
Keywords
Qualitative research, nursing, interviewing, pre-existing relationships, role conflict, trust
References
Alexander JG, deChesnay M, Marshall E et al (1989) Parallel Reactions in Rape Victims and Rape Researchers. Violence and Victims 4: 57-62.
Asselin ME (2003) Insider research: Issues to consider when doing qualitative research in your own setting. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development 19: 99-103.
Barnes J (1979) Who should know what?, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Beaver K, Luker K, Woods S (1999) Conducting research in the terminally ill: Challenges and considerations. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 5: 13-18.
Behar R (1996) The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart, Beacon, Boston.
Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K (2007) Breaching the wall: Interviewing people from other cultures. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 18: 150-156.
Borbasi S, Chapman Y, Gassner L et al (2002) Perceptions of the researcher: In-depth interviewing in the home. Contemporary Nurse 14: 24-37.
Brannen J (1993) The Effects of Research on Participants: The Findings from a Study of Mothers and Employment. The Sociological Review 41: 328-346.
Campbell R (2002) Emotionally Involved: The Impact of Researching Rape, Routledge, New York.
Cowles KV (1988) Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. Western Journal of Nursing Research 10: 163-179.
De Raeve L (1994) Ethical issues in palliative care research. Palliative Medicine 8: 298-305.
DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF (2006) The qualitative research interview. Medical Education 40: 314-321.
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S et al (2007) Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research 7: 327-353.
Drury V, Francis K, Chapman Y (2007) Taming the rescuer: The therapeutic nature of qualitative research interviews. International Journal of Nursing Practice 13: 383-384.
Drury V (2008). Rural mature-aged undergraduate students' rite of passage in learning to nurse: A constructivist grounded theory study (PhD). Churchill, Monash University.
FitzGerald M (1995). The experience of chronic illness in rural Australia (PhD). Armidale, The University of New England.
Glesne C, Peshkin A (1992) Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, Longman, London.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P (1983) Ethnography: Principles in practice, Tavistock, New York.
James A (2007). Preceptors and patients - the power of two: a phenomenological study of the experiences of second year nursing students on their first acute clinical placement (Masters). Churchill, Monash.
Johnson B, Macleod Clark J (2003) Collecting sensitive data: The impact on researchers. Qualitative Health Research 13.
Kavanaugh K, Ayres L (1998) 'Not as bad as it could have been': Assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics. Research in Nursing and Health 21: 91-97.
Kvale S (1996) InterViews: An introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Lee RM (1993) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics, Sage, London.
Manderson L, Bennett E, Andajani-Sutjahjo S (2006) The Social Dynamics of the Interview: Age, Class, and Gender. Qualitative Health Research 16: 1317-1334.
Oakley A (1981). Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms. In: Doing Feminist Research. H Roberts editor. New York: Routledge.
Peel E, Parry O, Douglas M et al (2006) 'It's No Skin off My Nose': Why People Take Part in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research 16: 1335-1349.
Roberts K, Taylor B (2002) Nursing Research Processes. An Australian Perspective. 2nd ed, Thomson, Melbourne.
Rowling L (1999) Being In, Being Out, Being With: Affect and the Role of the Qualitative Researcher in Loss and Grief Research. Mortality 4: 167-181.
Sieber JE, Stanley B (1988) Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist 43: 49-55.
Smith L (1992) Ethical issues in interviewing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 17: 98-103.
Stanley L, Wise S (1991). Feminist Research, Feminist Consciousness and Experiences of Sexism. In: Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. MM Fonow & J Cook editors. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Warr D (2004) Stories in the Flesh and Voices in the Head: Reflections on the Context and Impact of Research with Disadvantaged Populations. Qualitative Health Research 14: 578-587.
eContent Home
