Nursing student feedback on undergraduate research education: Implications for teaching and learning
Kathleen Peters
School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Science, University of Western Sydney, Sydney NSW
PP: 59 - 68
Abstract
Teaching research to undergraduate students presents many challenges to nurse academics. Yet facilitating students to develop skills in critically analysing and interpreting research is vital if we are to achieve evidence-based nursing practice.
This paper explores student feedback from a research unit undertaken by Australian undergraduate nurses in order to highlight the challenges for academics trying to engage students in this material. Three hundred and sixty nine (83.5%) second year nursing students provided qualitative and quantitative feedback at the completion of a research unit using a standardised student feedback form.
From a combination of the qualitative and quantitative feedback, the most positive aspects of the unit were the teaching staff, the group work and interaction in the class room and the online assessment item. Participants were least satisfied with the way in which the unit was presented, the written assessment items and assessment feedback and the perceived relevance of the unit.
The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of the theoretical underpinnings of adult learning and teaching in the development of future course materials.
Keywords
nurse education, research, undergraduate education
References
Andrusyszyn N, Iwasiw C and Goldenberg D (1999) Computer conferencing in graduate nursing education: Perceptions of students and faculty, Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 30(6): 272-278.
August-Brady MM (2005) Educational innovations. Teaching undergraduate research from a process perspective, Journal of Nursing Education 44(11): 519-521.
Australian Nursing & Midwifery Council (2006) National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse 4th edn, accessed at http://www.anmc.org.au/docs/Competency_standards_RN.pdf on 16 June 2008.
Biggs J (2003a) Teaching for quality learning at university 2nd edn, Open University Press., Berkshire.
Biggs J (2003b) Teaching for quality learning at university 2nd edn, The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, United Kingdom.
Brookfield S (1985) A critical definition of adult education, Adult Education Quarterly 36(1): 44-49.
Brookfield S (1988) Developing critically reflective practitioners: A rationale for training educators of adults, Routledge, City.
Burrows DE and Baillie L (1997) A strategy for teaching research to adult branch diploma students, Nurse Education Today 17(1): 39-45.
Courtney M (2007) Evidence for nursing practice, Elsevier, Marrickville NSW.
Dobratz MC (2003) Putting the pieces together: Teaching undergraduate research from a theoretical perspective, Journal of Advanced Nursing 41(4): 383-92.
Fazey D and Fazey J (1998) Perspectives on motivation: The implications for effective learning in higher education, in Brown S, Armstrong S and Thompson G (eds) Motivating students, pp.59-72, Kogan Page, Birmingham.
Hattie J and Marsh HW (1996) The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research 66(4): 507-42.
Kember D and McNaught C (2007) Ways of encouraging active learning, in Enhancing university teaching: Lessons from research into award-winning teachers, pp.97-113, Routledge., Oxon, UK.
Kenty JR (2001) Weaving undergraduate research into practice-based experiences, Nurse Educator 26(4): 182-86.
Koch B, Fitzgerald L, Evans D, O'Donnell M and McAuliffe L (2008) Use it or lose it: Putting research into action, in Borbasi S, Jackson D and Langford RW (eds), Navigating the Maze of Nursing Research: An Interactive Learning Adventure 2nd edn, Elsevier, Marrickville NSW.
Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Krause K, Hartley R, James R and McInnis C (2005) Amended FYEQ scale: Perception of teaching, in The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Lacey EA (1996) Facilitating research-based practice by educational intervention, Nurse Education Today 16(4): 296-301.
McAllister M and Rowe J (2003) Blackbirds singing in the dead of night? Advancing the craft of teaching qualitative research, Journal of Nursing Education 42(7): 296-303.
McAlpine H, Lockerbie L, Ramsay D and Beaman S (2002) Evaluating a web based graduate level nursing ethics course: Thumbs up of thumbs down? Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 33(1): 12-18.
McDonald J (2002) Is 'as good as face-face' as 'good as it gets'? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(2): 10-23.
Morris J (1999) Evaluation of open learning material designed for part of the diploma level research module for pre- and post-registration nurses, Nurse Education Today 19: 601-09.
Morris J and Maynard V (2000) Development and implementation of the MTutor on-line tutorial system for diploma level research students, Nurse Education Today 20: 600-07.
Nursing & Midwifery Council (2004) The NMC code of professional conduct: Standards for conduct, performance and ethics, accessed at http://www.nmc-uk.org/aFramedisplay.aspx?documentID=201 on 13 June 2008.
Oliver R and Omari A (2001) Student responses to collaborating and learning in a web-based environment, Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 17(1): 34-47.
Parahoo K (1999) A comparison of pre-Project 2000 and Project 2000 nurses' perceptions of their research training, research needs and their use of research in clinical areas, Journal of Advanced Nursing 29(1): 237-45.
Peckover S and Winterburn S (2003) Teaching research to undergraduate community nursing students: Reflections upon curriculum design, Nurse Education in Practice 3: 104-11.
Perkins ER (1992) Teaching research to nurses: issues for tutor training, Nurse Education Today 12(4): 252-57.
Pintrich PR and Schunk DH (1996) Motivation in education: Theory, research and application, Simon & Schuster, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
Rassool GH and Rawaf S (2007) Learning style preferences of undergraduate nursing students, Nursing Standard 21(32): 35-41.
Rowe J and McAllister M (2002) The craft of teaching qualitative research: Linking methodology to practice, Collegian 9(3): 8-14.
Salamonson Y and Lantz J (2005) Factors influencing nursing students preference for a hybrid format delivery in a pathophysiology course, Nurse Education Today 25: 9-16.
Sappington T (1984) Creating learning environments conducive to change: The role of fear/safety in the adult learning process, Innovative Higher Education 9(1): 19-29.
Schober B, Wagner P, Reimann R, Atria M and Spiel C (2006) Teaching research methods in an internet-based blended-learning setting, Methodology 2(2): 73-82.
Sharobeam MH and Howard K (2002) Teaching demands versus research productivity, Journal of College Science Teaching 1(7): 436-41.
Taylor S and Muncer S (2000) Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problems: Teaching statistics to nursing students, Nurse Education Today 20(358-364).
Tetley J and Glover J (1999) Use of experiential methods to teach research in a pre-registration nursing curriculum, Nurse Education Today 19: 633-638.
Vessey JA and DeMarco RF (2008) The undergraduate research fellows program: a unique model to promote engagement in research, Journal of Professional Nursing 24(6): 358-63.
Wang V and Sarbo L (2004) Philosophy, role of adult educators, and learning: How contextually adapted philosophies and the situational role of adult educators affect learners' transformation and emancipation, Journal of Transformative Education 2(3): 204-214.
eContent Home
