Implementing interprofessional learning in clinical education: Findings from a utility-led evaluation
Jane Conway
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW
PP: 187 - 200
Abstract
Clinical practice provides the stimulus for students and practitioners alike to recognise best practice and, if necessary, enhance and modify existing practice. Increasingly, literature related to health service delivery and health workforce planning focuses on the need for collaborative interprofessional work practices. Associated with this, there is considerable enthusiasm among those who educate health professionals for learning opportunities that promote interprofessional interaction among undergraduate learners with a view to inculcating among those students a desire to work collaboratively and collegially in practice.
This paper reports outcomes of an evaluation of one attempt to implement interprofessional learning in a single ward of a public hospital in New South Wales, Australia.
The evaluation methods included participant-observation by the author as a clinical facilitator of the interprofessional learning group and interviews with groups of students, clinical and academic staff. Key findings of the evaluation include the need for staff to model interprofessional collaboration and ensure that curricula make explicit the rationale for interprofessional learning, structure learning activity toward developing interprofessional competence for contemporary health service delivery, and, ensure that the espoused values of interprofessional practice and learning are reflected in assessment events.
Keywords
nursing, interprofessional learning, evaluation, undergraduate health curricula, clinical education
References
Aiken L, Clarke S, Sloane D, Sochalski J and Silber J (2002) Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association 288: 1987-1993.
Barr H (1998) Competent to collaborate: Towards a competency based model for interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care 12(2): 181-187.
Berwick DM (2003) Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12(Suppl.1): i2-i6.
Buchan J (1998) Nurses off the peg. Nursing Standard 13(1): 23-24.
Campbell SL (2003) Cultivating empowerment in nursing today for a strong profession tomorrow. Journal of Nursing Education 42(9): 423.
Clarke A and Dawson R (1999) Evaluation research: An introduction to principles, methods, and practice. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Conway J and McMillan M (2005) Maximising learning opportunities and preparing for professional practice. In Daly J, Speedy S and Jackson D (Eds) Contexts of nursing, pp.317-332. Sydney: MacLennan and Petty.
Cooper H, Carlisle C, Gibbs T and Watkins C (2001) Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary learning: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 35(2): 228-237.
El Ansari E, Phillips C and Hammick M (2001) Collaboration and partnerships: Developing the evidence base. Health and Social Care in the Community 9(4): 215-227.
Goble R (2001) Multiprofessional education: A position paper. Mastricht: The Network-Community Partnerships for Health through Innovative Education, Service and Research.
Guba E and Stufflebeam D (1970) Evaluation: The process of stimulating, aiding and abetting insightful action. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.
Horsburgh M, Laindin R and Williamson E (2001) Multi-professional learning: The attitudes of medical, nursing and pharmacy students to shared learning. Medical Education 35: 876-883.
Kaufman A (2001) Position paper on primary health care (PHC). Mastricht: The Network-Community Partnerships for Health through Innovative Education, Service and Research.
Leaviss J (2000) Exploring the perceived effect of an undergraduate multi-professional educational intervention. Medical Education 34(6): 483-486.
McClintock C and Lowe S (2001) Welfare reform and its enduring questions: What have we learned from evaluation research? New Directions for Evaluation 91: 9-20.
Naeve G (1998) The evaluative state revisited. European Journal of Education 33: 65-84.
Newburn T (2001) What do we mean by evaluation? Children and Society 15: 5-13.
Newton J and McKenna L (2007) The transitional journey through the graduate year: A focus group study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 44(7): 1231-1237.
NSW Health (2000) Council report 2000. Accessed 12 December 2008 at http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2000/pdf/Health_Council_Report.pdf.
Ross F and Southgate L (2000) Learning together in medical and nursing training: Aspirations and activity. Medical Education 34(6): 739-743.
Sandberg N, Stensaker B and Aamodt P (2002) Evaluation in policy implementation: An insider report. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 15: 44-55.
Segerholm C (2003) Research evaluation in National (State) politics and administration: A critical approach. American Journal of Evaluation 24: 353-372.
Stockdill SH, Baizerman M and Compton DW (2002) Toward a definition of the ECB process: A conversation with the ECB literature. New Directions for Evaluation 93: 7-25.
Stufflebeam DL (1980) An interview with Daniel L Stufflebeam. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2: 85-90.
Stufflebeam DL (1983) The CIPP model for program evaluation. In Madaus G, Scriven M and Stufflebeam D (Eds) Evaluation models: View points on educational and human services evaluation, pp.117-141. Boston MA: Kluwen-Nijhoff.
Stufflebeam DL and Shinkfield AJ (1985) Systematic evaluation. Boston MA: Kluwen-Nijhoff.
Weiss C (1987) The circuitry of enlightenment. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation 8: 274-281.
eContent Home
