The expectations of two New Zealand health services of the role of Clinical Chairs in Nursing and Midwifery

Jan Duke
Social Workers' Registration Board; Graduate School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Karen McBride-Henry
Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Capital and Coast District Health Board; Graduate School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Kenneth Walsh
Nursing Practice Development, South East Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW, Australia

Maralyn Foureur
Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW

PP: 129 - 141

Abstract

Clinical Professoriate positions within nursing or midwifery in New Zealand are a relatively recent development. One New Zealand University worked collaboratively to establish two joint clinical Professorial appointments with different District Health Boards. Each position had unique mandates around research platforms, and differing operational responsibilities.

This paper reports on the qualitative component of a larger study that aimed to examine the research culture, and the role of Clinical Chairs, within the two District Health Boards. This phase of the research involved semi-structured interviews with senior staff from the DHB to explore their experiences of working with the Clinical Professor.

Themes that emerged revolved around expectations of the role during its development, and the subsequent perceived outcomes. The need for objective measures of the roles' impact on clinical outcomes emerged as a key impression from the participants. Future research that focuses on measurements of outcomes attributable to the roles will ensure their sustainability over time.

Acknowledgment

The research was funded by a Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grant.

Keywords

nursing, midwifery, professoriate, practice development, Clinical Chairs, research


View references

References

Acorn S (1991) Relationship of role conflict and role ambiguity to selected job dimensions among joint appointees. Journal of Professional Nursing 7(4): 221-227.

Ament LA (2004) The evolution of midwifery faculty practice: Impact and outcomes of care. Nursing Outlook 52(4): 203-208.

Barger SE (2004) Academic nursing centres: The road from the past, the bridge to the future. Journal of Nursing Education 43(2): 60-65.

Beitz JM and Heinzer MM (2000) Faculty practice in joint appointments: Implication for nursing staff development. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 31(5): 232-237.

Boyer ER (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton NJ.

Budden L (1994) Nursing faculty practice: Benefits and costs. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19(6): 1241-1246.

Butterworth A, Jackson C, Brown E, Hessey E, Ferguson J and Orme M (2005) Clinical academic careers for educators and researchers in nursing. Journal of Research in Nursing 10(1): 85-97.

Chafetz L, Collins-Bride GM and White M (2004) A nursing faculty practice for the severely mentally ill: Merging practice with research. Nursing Outlook 52(4): 209-214.

Cooney C, Dignam D and Honeyfield J (2001) The potential of joint appointments and clinical chairs to promote nursing education, practice and research: Nurse Education in the Tertiary Sector & Nursing Executives of New Zealand.

Crane S (1989) Joint appointments: The Deakin experience. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 6(3): 21-25.

Darbyshire P, Downes M, Collins C and Dyer S (2004) Moving from institutional dependence to entrepreneurialism. Creating and funding a collaborative and practice development position. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14: 926-934.

Dracup K (2004) Impact of faculty practice on an academic institution's mission and vision. Nursing Outlook 52(4): 174-178.

Dunn SV and Yates P (2000) The role of Australian chairs in clinical nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 31(1): 165-171.

Ellis LB (2006) The clinical doctorate for nurses in Australia: Findings of a scoping exercise. Nurse Education Today 26(6): 484-493.

Emden C (1986) Joint appointments: An Australian study illuminates world views. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 3(4): 30-41.

Esperat MC, Green A and Acton C (2004) One vision of academic nursing centers. Nursing Economics 22(6): 307-312.

Fairbrother P and Mathers NJ (2004) Lecturer practitioners in six professions: Combining cultures. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13(5): 539.

Fiandt K, Barr K, Hille G, Pelish P, Pozehl B and Hulme P (2004) Identifying clinical scholarship guidelines for faculty practice. Journal of Professional Nursing 20(3): 147-155.

Finlay L (2002) 'Outing' the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research 12(4) April: 531-545.

Gilliss CL (2004) Faculty practice comes of age: Standing on the shoulders of giants. Nursing Outlook 52(4): 161.

Happell B (2005) Clinical-academic partnerships research: Converting the rhetoric into reality. The International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research 11(1): 1218-1226.

Humpheys J, Martin H, Roberts B and Ferriti C (2004) Strengthening an academic nursing center through partnership. Nursing Outlook 52(4): 197-202.

Huttelmyer CM and Donnelly GF (1996) Joint appointments in practice positions. Nursing Administration Quarterly 20(4): 7-16.

Lang LK and Evans NM (2004) A vision and a plan for academic nursing centers. In Evans NM and Lang LK (eds) Academic nursing practice: Helping to shape the future of health care, pp.3-19, Springer, New York.

Lantz J, Reed RC and Lewkowitz S (1994) Collaborative research-academic appointments: The myth and the reality. Nursing Administration Quarterly 18(4): 38-43.

Lumby J (1996) View on Australian clinical chairs. Contemporary Nurse 5(1): 2-3.

Lynaugh JE (2004) Academic nursing practice: Looking back. In Evans LK and Lang NM (eds) Academic nursing practice: Helping to shape the future of health care, pp.20-37, Springer, New York.

Mackey TA, Cole FL and Lindenberg J (2005) Quality improvement and changes in diabetic patient outcomes in an academic nurse practitioner primary care practice. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 17(12): 547-553.

Martin LM (1995) Nursing faculty practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21: 743-747.

McNeil NO, Mackey TA and Sherwood GD (2004) Quality and customer service aspects of faculty practice. Nursing Outlook 52(4): 189-196.

McVicar A and Caan W (2005) Research capability in doctoral training. Journal of Research in Nursing 10(6): 627-646.

Miller KL, Bleich MR, Hathaway D and Warren C (2004) Developing the academic nursing practice in the midst of new realities in higher education. Journal of Nursing Education 43(2): 55-59.

Ogilvie L, Strang V, Hayes P, Raiwet C, Andruski L and Heinrich M (2004) Value and vulnerability: Reflections on joint appointments. Journal of Professional Nursing 20(2): 110-117.

Pope C, Mays N and Popay J (2007) Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A guide to methods. Open University Press, Berkshire UK.

Rowley M (1999) Editorial. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand 14(3): 2-3.

Salvoni M (2001) Joint appointments: Another dimension of building bridges. Nurse Education Today 212: 65-70.

Saxe JM, Burgel BJ, Stringari-Murray S, Collins-Bride GM and Dennehy PSJ (2004) What is faculty practice? Nursing Outlook 52(4): 166-173.

Sebastion JG, Mosley CW and Bleich MR (2004) The academic nursing practice dean: An emerging role. Journal of Nursing Education 43(2): 66-70.

Tamlyn D and Myrick F (1995) Joint appointments: A vehicle for influencing health care change. Journal of Advanced Nursing 22: 490-493.

Williamson GR (2004) Lecturer practitioners in UK nursing and midwifery: What is the evidence? A systematic review of the research literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13: 787-795.

Winter R, Griffiths M and Green K (2000) The 'academic' qualities of practice: What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD? Studies in Higher Education 25(1).



RSS Facebook Twitter

Sign Me Up for latest release updates

*  Email Address:
    First Name:
    Last Name:
*  I am interested in::





 

Web Feed

Latest Articles

Special Issues

Advances in Contemporary Health Care for Vulnerable Populations
Volume 42/1
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Community & Family Health Care (3rd edn)
Volume 41/1
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Complex Health Care: Nursing Interventions
Volume 40/2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Community and Family Health Care (2nd edn)
Volume 40/1
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nurse Education (2nd edn)
Volume 38/1-2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Indigenous Health Care (2nd edn)
Volume 37/1
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nursing: Workforce and Workplaces
Volume 36/1-2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Modeling of Clinical Nursing Care
Volume 35/2
Contents


Advances in Contemporary Mental Health Nursing (2nd edn)
Volume 34/2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nursing and Gender
Volume 33/2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nurse Education
Volume 32/1-2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nursing: History of Nursing and Midwifery in Australasia
Volume 30/2
Summary | Contents


crossref.org - The citation linking backbone



Website by Arrowsmith Websites. Website Design Sunshine Coast, Australia.