Let's Talk About Sex: Risky Business for Cancer and Palliative Care Clinicians
Amanda J Hordern
Cancer Information & Support Service, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne VIC
Annette F Street
Professor, Cancer and Palliative Care Studies; Director, Centre for Research in Nursing, School of Nursing, La Trobe University, Bundoora VIC
PP: 49 - 60
Abstract
Few health professionals feel confident and comfortable when communicating with patients about the sexual and intimate changes that might occur after a diagnosis of cancer. Little research has focused on why health professionals find this type of patient communication so challenging.
Drawing on data from a larger study examining issues of intimacy and sexuality from the perspectives of patients and health professionals in cancer and palliative care, this paper will present the health professional perspective. In the larger study a reflexive inquiry methodology enabled data to be collected through semi-structured participant interviews (n=82), a textual analysis of national and international clinical practice guidelines (n=33) and documented feedback from patients and health professionals attending educational forums where preliminary findings of the study were presented (n=15). In the part of the study reported here, a total of 32 health professionals recognised as members of a multidisciplinary team and working in cancer and or palliative care for a minimum of 12 months were interviewed.
Results revealed that patient sexuality and intimacy was largely medicalised so that health professional discussions remained at the level of patient fertility, contraception, erectile or menopausal status. Many unchecked assumptions about patient sexuality were made by health professionals, based on the patient’s age, diagnosis, culture, partnership and disease status. It was personally confronting and a ‘risky’ business to communicate about issues of patient intimacy and sexuality after cancer, particularly when the clinical setting emphasised medicalised, health professional driven and problem-based communication. Implications for practice will be discussed.
Keywords
Sexuality and intimacy, communication, qualitative research, reflexivity, cancer and palliative care, vulnerability
References
Akkerman D (2004) Cancer, Sensuality, Sexuality and Self Image. ACCIS - On Call Information Sheet, The Cancer Council Victoria, Australia, 1-6.
Anderson BL, Woods XA and Copeland LJ (1997) Sexual sel-schema and sexual morbidity among gynaecologic cancer survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65: 221-229.
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing (2003) Psychosocial Care Guidelines: A World First.
Bazely P and Richards L (2000) The NVivo Qualitative Project Book, Sage, London.
Butler L, Banfield V, Terry S and Allen K (1998) Conceptualising sexual health in cancer care, Western Journal of Nursing Research 20: 683-699.
Chamberlain Wilmoth M (2001) The aftermath of breast cancer: An altered sexual self. Cancer Nursing 24: 278-286.
Creswell JW (2003) Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches, Sage, California.
Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Liowina DV, Schornagel JH and Aaronson NK (2001) Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: An observational study. Journal of the American Medical Association 285: 1351-1357.
Ezzy D (2002) Data analysis during data collection. Qualitative analysis: Practice and Innovation. Melbourne, Allen & Unwin.
Giddens A (1991) The Sequestration of Sickness and Death: Modernity and Self Identity. Standford Press, USA.
Giddens A (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Policy Press, Cambridge.
Giddens A (1993) The Nature of Modernity: Modernity and Self-Identity, Love and Sexuality, MacMillan Press, London.
Giddens A (1999) Frequently asked questions (FAQs). London School of Economics. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/Giddens/FAQs.htm.
eContent Home
