Archives
The Evolving Relationship of Technology and Nursing Practice: Negotiating the provision of care in a high tech environment
Amanda Henderson
Nursing Director, Education, Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital and District Health Service, Woolloongabba; Adjunct Associate Professor, Griffith University, Nathan QLD
Abstract
Nurses proudly espouse that they provide 'care' in highly technological environments that focus on 'cure'. How care is achieved in such environments continues to be debated.
There is evidence that care is dominated by the management of technology. The literature identifies that the nature of care provision by nurses is largely dependant on nurses' experience with complex technologies. More specifically, nurses familiar with the technology integral to the care environment are more likely to 'engage' with the patient in their care.
There is evidence that nurses do provide patient-centred care in a technologically dominant world. The nature of such care is invariably dependant on the specific context of the user and the technology. This means nurses require highly developed capabilities to 'situate' themselves within these specific contexts to focus on the particular needs of the patient.
Experienced nurses are able to articulate and demonstrate opportunities whereby they situate themselves with patients to learn about them and their needs. It is important that this knowledge and practice pertinent to this domain is articulated to assist in the development of capabilities for nurses to 'care' for patients' direct or indirect expressed needs in a highly technological environment.
Keywords
nurse, technology, patient, context, practice, environment
References
Alasad J (2002) Managing technology in the intensive care unit: the nurses' experience. International Journal of Nursing Studies 39: 407-413.
Alliex S (2004) Caring in a technological environment: How is this possible? Contemporary Nurse 17: 32-43.
Aronowitz RA (1998) Making Sense of Illness. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.
Barnard A (1996) Technology and nursing: an anatomy of definition. International Journal of Nursing Studies 33: 433-441.
Barnard A and Sandelowski M (2001) Technology and humane nursing care: (ir)reconcilable or invented difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing 34: 367-375.
Benner P and Wrubel J (1989) The Primacy of Caring in Health and Illness. Addison Wesley, Menlo Park, California.
Benner P, Tanner C and Chesla C (1992) From beginner to expert: gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing. Advances in Nursing Science 14: 13-28.
Bevan M (1998) Nursing in the dialysis unit: technological enframing and a declining art, or an imperative for caring. Journal of Advanced Nursing 27: 730-736.
Burke KG and Fairman J (2000) The patient is awake. American Journal of Nursing 100: 78-81.
Chesla C (1996) Reconciling technologic and family care in critical care nursing. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 28(3) 199-203.
Cooper MC (1993) The intersection of technology and care in the ICU. Advanced Nursing Science 15: 23-32.
Henderson A (1994) Power and knowledge in nursing practice: the contribution of Foucault. Journal of Advanced Nursing 20: 935-937.
Heskins FM (1997) Exploring dichotomies of caring, gender and technology in intensive care nursing: a qualitative approach. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 13: 65-71.
Fairman J (1992) Watchful vigilance: nursing care, technology and the development of Intensive Care Units. Nursing Research 41:56-60.
McConnell EA and Murphy EK (1990) Nurses' use of technology: an international concern. International Nursing Review 37: 331-334.
Purkis ME (1996) Nursing in quality space: technologies governing experiences of care. Nursing Inquiry 3: 101-111.
Ray MA (1987) Technological Caring: A new model in critical care. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 6: 166-173.
Wichowski HC (1994) Professional uncertainty: nurses in the technologically intense arena. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19: 1162-1167.
eContent Home