A millennial benchmark of nurse-academics' scholarly productivity
Kathryn L Roberts
Professor of Nursing, Flinders University, SA
Beverley J Turnbull
School of Health Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin NT
PP: 052 - 062
Abstract
The benchmark against which nurse-academics are judged primarily remains 'scholarly productivity'. This study sought to examine levels of scholarly productivity amongst Australian nurse academics: where they are putting their emphasis, and what progress they are making.
This quantitative study used a questionnaire survey technique that identified individual items of scholarship over a two-year period. The use of two author-developed rating scales, the General Scholarship Index (GSI) and the DEST Scholarship Index (DSI) enabled a comparison of nurse academics with other academic disciplines.
Findings from the study underscore the positive association between academic rank, qualifications and scholarly productivity. To facilitate increasing the latter to a level comparable with other disciplines, nurse academics may need to refocus their energies on DEST approved activities. A work climate more conducive to fostering the ethos and skills of academic 'scholarly productivity' is needed.
Keywords
scholarly productivity; academic rank; scholarship indices; publication
References
Acorn S (1990). Scholarly productivity of university nursing faculty. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 22(2): 7-13.
Clare J and Hawes C (2001). Engendering Change: Empowering nurse academics to take part in a university research culture. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 18(4): 32-36.
Megel M, Langston N and Creswell J (1988). Scholarly productivity: a survey of nursing faculty researchers. Journal of Professional Nursing 4(1): 45-54.
Melland H (1995). Nurse-educators and the demands of research. Journal of Nursing Education 34(2): 71-76.
Ostmoe P (1986). Correlates of university nurse faculty publication productivity. Journal of Nursing Education 25(5): 207-212.
Roberts K (1996). A snapshot of Australian nursing scholarship 1993-1994. Collegian 3(1): 4-10.
Roberts K (1997). Nurse academics' scholarly productivity: framed by the system, facilitated by mentoring. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 14(3): 5-13.
Roberts K and Turnbull B (2002). From apprentices to academics: are nurses catching up? Collegian 9(1): 24-30.
Roberts K and Turnbull B (2002-2003). Scholarly productivity: are nurse-academics catching up? The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 20(2): 8-14.
Roberts K and Turnbull B (2004). Nurse academics' scholarly productivity: Perceived frames and facilitators. Contemporary Nurse 17(3): 282-292.
Turnbull B and Roberts K (in press). Nurse academics' mentorship: Rhetoric or reality? Collegian.
Wilkes L, Borbasi S, Hawes C, Stewart M and May D (2002). Measuring the outputs of nursing research and development in Australia: the researchers. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 19(4): 15-20.
Worrall-Carter L and Snell R (2003/4). Nurse academics meeting the challenges of scholarship and research. Contemporary Nurse 16(1-2): 40-50.
eContent Home
