Nurse-academics' scholarly productivity: Perceived frames and facilitators
Kathryn L Roberts
Professor of Nursing, Flinders University, SA
Beverley J Turnbull
School of Health Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin NT
PP: 282 - 292
Abstract
The reward system within Universities remains focused on research, with a benchmark of scholarly productivity, especially in relation to promotion. Despite their relative newness to the tertiary system, nurse academics are judged by the same standards as other disciplines.
This study sought to examine factors that constrained and/or facilitated scholarly productivity. The study used a questionnaire survey technique to establish current productivity levels, and frame and facilitating factor theory and analysis to identify major constraints and facilitators.
Findings from the study were that the unremitting nature of teaching, course coordination and university service workloads interact to the detriment of research and writing. Facilitating factors included a departmental culture that values and supports research, in conjunction with tangible support from University management. Mentorship was viewed as desirable, but often not available. An environment that more actively prioritises, fosters and supports academic scholarly productivity is needed.
Keywords
scholarly productivity; frame factors; facilitators; constraints; mentoring
References
Acorn S (1990): Scholarly Productivity of University Nursing Faculty. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 22(2): 7-13.
Bazeley P, Kemp L, Stevens K,Asmar C, Grbich C, March H and Bhathal R (1996). Waiting in the wings: A study of early career academic researchers in Australia. Canberra, University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.
Bernstein B (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. New Directions for the Sociology of Education. Young, M. London, Collier-MacMillan.
Brown H (1999): Mentoring New Faculty. Nurse Educator 24(1): 48-51.
McVeigh C, Moyle K, Forrester K, Chaboyer W, Patterson E and St John W (2002): Publication Syndicates: In support of Nursing Scholarship. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 33(2 March/April): 63-66.
Megel M, Langston N and Creswell J (1988): Scholarly productivity: A survey of nursing faculty researchers. Journal of Professional Nursing 4(1): 45-54.
Ostmoe P (1986): Correlates of university nurse faculty publication productivity. Journal of Nursing Education 25(5): 207-212.
Ramcharan P, Ashmore R, Licklin L and Drew J (2001): Nursing Scholarship within the British university system. British Journal of Nursing 10(3): 196-202.
Roberts K (1991): Influences on nurse-academics' instructional planning decisions. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 8(3): 42-50.
Roberts K (1997): Nurse academics' scholarly productivity: framed by the system, facilitated by mentorship. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 14(3): 6-13.
Roberts K and Turnbull B (2002a): At the millennium: a slice of scholarship. Collegian 9(4): 10-17.
Roberts K and Turnbull B (2002b): From apprentices to academics: Are nurses catching up? Collegian 9(1): 24-30.
Roberts K and Turnbull B (2002-2003): Scholarly productivity: are nurse academics catching up? Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 20(2): 8-14.
Roberts K and Turnbull B (2004): A millennial benchmark of scholarly productivity. submitted.
Turnbull B and Roberts K (2004): Nurse-academics mentorship: rhetoric or reality. submitted.
Worrall-Carter L (1995). The emergence of a scholarly tradition in nursing. In: Scholarship in the Discipline of Nursing. Gray, G and Pratt, R. Melbourne, Churchill Livingstone: 57-75.
Worrall-Carter L and Snell R (2003-2004): Nurse academics meeting the challenges of scholarship and research. Contemporary Nurse 16(1-2): 40-50.
eContent Home
