Evaluating performance feedback: A research study into issues of credibility and utility for nursing clinicians
Jennifer Fereday
Department of Nursing and Midwifery Research and Practice Development, Children, Youth and Women's Health Service, Women's and Children's Hospital Campus, Adelaide SA
Eimear Muir-Cochrane
Chair: Mental Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide SA
PP: 137 - 148
Abstract
Performance feedback is information provided to employees about how well they are performing in their work role. The nursing profession has a long history of providing formal, written performance reviews, traditionally from a manager to subordinate, with less formal feedback sources including peers, clients and multidisciplinary team members.
This paper is based on one aspect of a PhD research study exploring the dynamics of performance feedback primarily from the nursing clinicians' perspective. The research reported here discusses the impact of the social relationship (between the source and recipient of performance feedback) on the recipient's evaluation of feedback as being 'credible' and 'useful' for self-assessment. Focus group interviews were utilised to ascertain the nursing clinicians' perspectives of performance feedback. Thematic analysis of the data was informed by the Social Phenomenology of Alfred Schutz (1967) specifically his theories of intersubjective understanding.
Findings supported the level of familiarity between the feedback source and the nursing clinician as a significant criterion influencing the acceptance or rejection of feedback. Implications for the selection of performance feedback sources and processes within nursing are discussed.
Keywords
feedback; employee performance appraisal; professional practice; credibility
References
Argyris C (1973): The nature of competence-acquisition activities and their relationship to therapy. In: Bennis W, Berlew D, Schein E & Steele F (eds) Interpersonal Dynamics - Essays and Readings on Human Interaction, 3rd ed, pp. 546-560.The Dorsey Press, Illinois
Anderson I (2003): Developing a framework to assess competence in leg ulcer care. Professional Nurse 18 (9): 518-22.
Armann M (1996): Performance Management Part 2: Performance Review and Appraisal. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses 44 (8): 421-22.
Bandura A (1997): Self-Efficacy - The Exercise of Control, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
Black R (2000): Giving and Getting Feedback. Canadian Nurse 16 (7): 37.
Boyatzis R (1998): Transforming Qualitative Information - Thematic Analysis and Code Development, Sage Publications, California.
Bradley D & Huseman S (2003): Validating Competency at the Bedside. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development 19 (4): 165-73.
Crabtree B & Miller W (1999): A Template Approach to Text analysis: Developing and Using Codebooks. In: Crabtree B & Miller W (eds) Doing Qualitative Research, pp. 163-177. Sage, Newbury Park.
Dumas L, Villeneuve J & Chevrier J (2000):A Tool To Evaluate How To Learn From Experience In Clinical Settings. Journal of Nursing Education 39 (6): 251-58.
Fatt J (1999): It's not what you say it's how you say it. Communication World 16 (6): 37-40
Fiske S (1993): Social Cognition and Social Perception. Annual Review of Psychology 44: 155-94.
Fox-Young S (1995): Issues in the assessment of expert nurses: purposes, standards and methods. Nurse Education Today 15 (2): 96-100.
Frey J & Fontana A (1993): The Group Interview in Social Research. In: Morgan D (ed) Successful Focus Groups - Advancing the state of the art, pp 20-34. Sage Publications, California.
Grohar-Murray M & DiCroce H (1997): Leadership and Management in Nursing, Appleton & Lange, Connecticut.
Hepworth S (1991):The assessment of student nurses. Nurse Education Today 11: 46-52.
Huber D (2000): Leadership and Nursing Care Management, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Hulett K (2002): An Honest Evaluation. Advisor Today March: 86.
Johns C (1995): The value of reflective practice for nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing 4: 23-30.
Kouzes J & Posner B (1993): Credibility - How Leaders Gain and Lose it, Why People Demand It, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Kramar R, McGraw P & Schuler R (1997): Human Resource Management in Australia, 3rd edn, Longman, Melbourne.
Krueger R & Casey M (2000): Focus Groups - A practical guide for applied research, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, California.
London M (1997): Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Longenecker C & Post F (1999): Effective and legally defensible performance appraisals. Journal of Compensation and Benefits 11(6): 41-47.
Manzoni J (2002): A Better Way to Deliver Bad News. Harvard Business Review 80 (9) 114-19.
Marriner-Tomey A (2000): Guide to Nursing Management and Leadership, 6th edn, Mosby, St Louis.
Mathews D (2000): Developing a Perioperative Peer Performance Appraisal System. Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal 72 (6): 1039-46.
Mitchell D & Green E (1996): Teaching Managers to appraise Performances. Nursing Management 27 (3 Critical Care Management Edition): 48C-48D.
Morgan D & Krueger R (1993): When to use focus groups and why. In: Successful Focus Groups - Advancing the state of the art, Sage, Newbury Park.
Murphy J: (1997) Nurses' Perception of Performance Appraisal - a pilot study, Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of South Australia.
(NBSA) Nurses Board of South Australia (2000): Your Practice, Continuing Competence and Self-Regulation, March.
Purdy M (1997): The Problem of Self- Assessment in Nurse Education. Nurse Education Today 17 (2): 135-39.
Rice P & Ezzy D (1999): Qualitative Research Methods - A Health Focus, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
Rosier N (2003): Fast Feedback Pays Off. Aftermarket Business 113 (5): 8.
Schoonover-Schoffner K (1995): The usefulness of formal objective performance feedback: an exploration of meaning, Doctoral Thesis, University of Kansas.
Schutz A (1967): The Phenomenology of the Social World, G Walsh and F Lehnert, trans, North Western University Press, Illinois.
Translation of 'Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt' (1932).
Simons T (1999): Behavioral integrity as a critical ingredient for transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management 12 (2): 89-104.
Smith M (2000): A Reflective Teaching Learning Process to Enhance Personal Knowing. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives 21 (3): 130-32.
Smith M (2003): Empower staff with praiseworthy appraisals. Nursing Management 34 (1): 16-17.
Steers R. & Black J (1994): Organizational Behavior, 5th edn, Harper Collins, New York.
Taylor B (2000): Reflective Practice - A Guide for Nurses and Midwives, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards.
Williams B & Walker L (2003): Facilitating perception and imagination in generating change through reflective practice groups. Nurse Education Today 23: 131-37.
Vuorinen R, Tarkka M & Meretoja R (2000): Peer evaluation in nurses' professional development: a pilot study to investigate the issues. Journal of Clinical Nursing 9: 273-81.
Wood E (2002): The Lived Experience of Registered Nurses who participate in Performance Appraisal Interviews. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Auckland University of Technology.
Yoder-Wise P (2003): Leading and Managing in Nursing, 3rd edn, Mosby, St Louis.
eContent Home
