Enrolled nurse medication administration
Anne Kimberley
Coordinator Postgraduate Programs, Centre for Nursing Education, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands WA
Helen Myers
Clinical Nurse Consultant (Research), Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital; Lecturer, School of Nursing and Public Health, Edith Cowan University, Perth WA
Sue Davis
Corporate Nursing, Research and Education, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands WA
Penny Keogh
Coordinator, Continuing Education, Centre for Nursing Education, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands WA
Di Twigg
Area Executive Director, Nursing Services, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital and North Metropolitan Health Service; Senior Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth WA
PP: 063 - 070
Abstract
This paper describes an initiative undertaken at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital in Perth, Western Australia to enhance the professional development of enrolled nurses to allow them to administer medications without the direct supervision of a registered nurse.
This practice change proved to be a positive step for the hospital and for enrolled nurses. Benefits for patients were identified as greater continuity of care and increased timeliness of medication administration. The benefits for enrolled nurses were increased job satisfaction, improved morale and self esteem while the main benefit for registered nurses was decreased stress and workload.
Keywords
enrolled nurses; scope of nursing practice; professional practice; decision making framework; medication administration
References
Brown, R.A. (1995). Enrolled nurses come in from the cold? British Journal of Nursing, 4(3), 125-126.
Castledine, G. (1995). Enrolled nurses: do they have a role? British Journal of Nursing, 4(10), 570.
Cooper, D. (1993). Enrolled over and died. Nursing Standard, 7(27), 46-47.
Francis, B. & Humphreys, J. (1999). Enrolled nurses and the professionalisation of nursing: A comparison of nurse education and skill-mix in Australia and the UK. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 36, 127-135.
Gibson,T. & Heartfield, M. (2003). Contemporary enrolled nursing practice: Opportunities and issues. Collegian, 10(1), 22-26.
Hewlett, R. (2002). Enrolled nurse education recommenced in New Zealand. 5th NENA (National Enrolled Nurse Association) Biennial Conference, Melbourne 28th-30th April from www.anf.org.au/nena/en_education_nz.pdf. Accessed 22nd July 2003.
Kenny, C. (1993). Enrolled nurses: Why are they devalued? Nursing Standard, 8(4), 28-31.
Kirkpatrick, D (1996). Revisiting Kirkpatrick's four-level-model. Training & Development. 1, 54-57.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, California.
McDonald, T. (2002). Enrolled nurses to administer medications! The Lamp, 59(11), 23.
McKenna, L., Sadler, R., Long, M. & Burke, G. (2001). Enrolled nurse education: Final report to the National Review of Nursing Education. Centre for the Economics of Education and Training, Monash University, Melbourne.
Mackenzie, J. (1997). 'A thorny problem for feminism': an analysis of the subjective work experiences of enrolled nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 6: 365-370.
Queensland Nursing Council. (1998a). Final report of the scope of nursing practice project: the development, refinement and validation of the scope of nursing practice decision making framework: volume 1. Queensland Nursing Council, Brisbane.
Queensland Nursing Council. (1998b). Scope of Nursing Practice Decision Making Framework. Queensland Nursing Council, Brisbane.
Swaffield, L. (1991). Labelled second-class? Nursing Times, 87(12), 48-49.
eContent Home
