Critical ethnographic methodology in nursing research: Issues and solutions
Mette Groenkjaer
Lecturer; International Coordinator, Vendsyssel School of Nursing, Hjoerring, Denmark
PP: 049 - 055
Abstract
Five methodological issues were encountered in a study using critical ethnography to investigate nurses' attitudes, knowledge and practices towards patients with alcohol and drug related problems in a general hospital.
These issues related to the recording of field notes, over-identification with participants, the role of being a researcher, the effect of the researcher's presence - the Hawthorne effect, and cultural differences. The latter issue was viewed from the personal perspective as an international student from Denmark conducting the research in an Australian setting.
This paper discusses the issues in turn and concludes with recommendations on how they might be effectively addressed by other researchers considering to use critical ethnography.
Keywords
critical ethnography; methodological issues; field notes; researcher reflections; international student
References
Baillie L (1995): Ethnography and nursing research: a critical appraisal. Nurse Researcher, December, 3(2): 5-21.
Berman H, Ford-Gilboe M & Campbell J (1998): Combining stories and numbers: a methodologic approach for a critical nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 21(1): 1-15.
Carroll J (1995): The negative attitudes of some general nurses towards drug misusers. Nursing Standard, 9(34): 36-38.
Carroll J (1996): Attitudes to drug users according to staff grade. Professional Nurse, 11(11): 718-720.
Carspecken PF (1996): Critical Ethnography in Educational Research; A Theoretical and Practical Guide, Routledge, London.
de Laine M (1997): Ethnography: Theory and Applications in Health Research, MacLennan & Petty, Sydney.
Goodin B, Burns L & Hodder T (1995): Process evaluation of a large scale population survey of practising nurses knowledge, work-related attitudes and clinical behaviours toward individuals with alcohol and other drug-related problems. Nurses Responding to Substance Abuse Conference, 2nd, 1995, Perth, W.A: 28-37.
Guba E & Lincoln Y (1985): Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills California.
Hammersley M & Atkinson P (1995): Ethnography: Principles in Practice, (2nd ed.) Routledge, London.
Koch T (1994): Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(5): 976-986.
Minichiello V, Sullivan G, Greenwood K & Axford R (1999): Handbook for Research Methods in Health Sciences, Addison Wesley, Sydney.
Moodley-Kunnie T (1988): Attitudes and perceptions of health professionals toward substance use disorders and substance-dependent individuals. The International Journal of Addictions, 23(5): 469-475.
Polit D & Hungler B (1999): Nursing Research - Principles and Methods, 6th edition, J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.
Rose K & Webb C (1998): Analysing data: maintaining rigour in a qualitative study. Qualitative Health Research, 8(4): 556-562.
Rosenthal T (1989): excerpt from 'Using ethnography to study nursing education', Western Journal of Nursing Research 11(1): 120-121.
eContent Home
