Making sense of research: A guide for critiquing a paper

Lynette Stockhausen
Deputy Head of School, School of Nursing, Griffith University, Meadowbrook QLD

Moya Conrick
Lecturer, School of Nursing, Griffith University, Brisbane QLD

PP: 038 - 048

Abstract

Learning how to critique research articles is one of the fundamental skills of scholarship in any discipline. The range, quantity and quality of publications available today via print, electronic and Internet databases means it has become essential to equip students and practitioners with the prerequisites to judge the integrity and usefulness of published research.

Finding, understanding and critiquing quality articles can be a difficult process. This article sets out some helpful indicators to assist the novice to make sense of research.

| More

Keywords

research; nursing; critique; publications


View references

References

American Psychological Association (2001): Publication Manual of the America Psychological Association. (5th Edition). Lancaster Press, Pennsylvania.

Conrick M (2002): Looking for a needle in a haystack: Searching the Internet for quality resources. Contemporary Nurse 12(1): 49-57.

Dunn V, Critchton N, Roe B, Seers K & Williams K (1997): Using research for practice: A UK experience of the Barriers Scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23(6): 1203-10.

Geyman J, Deyo R & Ramsey S (2000): Evidence-based Clinical Practice: Concepts and approaches. Butterworth Heinmann, Boston.

Guyatt G & Rennie D (Eds.) (2002): User's Guide to the Medical Literature. A manual for evidence-based clinical practice. American Medical Association, Chicago.

Kim P, Eng T, Deering M, & Maxfield A (1999): Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: Review. British Medical Journal 318(7184): 647-9.

LoBiondo-Wood G & Haber J (2001): Nursing Research: Methods, critical appraisal and utilization. (5th Edition), Mosby, St Louis.

Oermann M (2002): Writing for Publication in Nursing. Lippocott, Philadelphia.

Polit D, Beck C & Hungler B (2001): Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, appraisal and utilization. Lippincott, Philadelphia.

Roberts K & Taylor B (1998). Nursing Research Process: An Australian perspective. Nelson, Melbourne.

Schneider Z, Elliott D, LoBiondo-Wood G & Haber J (2003): Nursing Research: Methods, critical appraisal and utilisation (2nd Edition). Mosby, Sydney.

Schulmeister L (1998): Quotation and reference accuracy of three nursing journals. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 30(2): 143-6.

Walsh M (1997): Perceptions of barriers to implementing research. Nursing Standard 11(9): 34-37.



RSS Facebook Twitter

Sign Me Up

*Email Address
First Name
Surname

Web Feed

Latest Articles

Special Issues

Advances in Contemporary Health Care for Vulnerable Populations
Volume 42/1
Summary


Advances in Contemporary Community & Family Health Care (3rd edn)
Volume 41/1
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Complex Health Care: Nursing Interventions
Volume 40/2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Community and Family Health Care (2nd edn)
Volume 40/1
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nurse Education (2nd edn)
Volume 38/1-2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Indigenous Health Care (2nd edn)
Volume 37/1
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nursing: Workforce and Workplaces
Volume 36/1-2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Modeling of Clinical Nursing Care
Volume 35/2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Mental Health Nursing (2nd edn)
Volume 34/2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nursing and Gender
Volume 33/2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nurse Education
Volume 32/1-2
Summary | Contents


Advances in Contemporary Nursing: History of Nursing and Midwifery in Australasia
Volume 30/2
Summary | Contents


crossref.org - The citation linking backbone



Website by Arrowsmith Websites. Website Design Sunshine Coast, Australia.