Making sense of methodologies: A paradigm framework for the novice researcher
Barbara M Grant
Acting Co-Director, Centre for Professional Development, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Lynne S Giddings
Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
PP: 010 - 028
Abstract
Methodologies abound in the field of health and social science research, making a confusing terrain for new researchers. In this article, we offer order out of confusion. Drawing on our work as postgraduate teachers, we outline a paradigm framework which proposes that methodologies are similar or different because of their underlying assumptions and values.
We identify four major paradigms, explain the distinctive assumptions which underpin them, and show how each figures the researcher and the researcher-researched relationship. Along the way, we place a variety of methodologies into their paradigm of origin and offer some illustrative examples of health research.
Keywords
methodology; paradigm; positivist; postpositivist; interpretivist; radical/critical; poststructuralist
References
Angus, LB (1986) Research traditions, ideology and critical ethnography. Discourse 7(1): 61-78.
Berg, BL (2001) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Blaxter, L, Hughes, C & Tight, M (2001) How to research, Philadelphia University Press, Philadelphia.
Blumer, H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Candy, PC (1989) Alternative paradigms in educational research. Australian Educational Researcher 16(3): 1-11.
Carr, W & Kemmis, S (1986) Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research, Falmer Press, London.
Charon, JM (1998) Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Cheek, J (2000) Postmodern and poststructuralist approaches to nursing research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Clifford, J (1988) The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature and art, Harvard University Press, Boston.
Clough, P (1992) The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism, Routledge, New York.
Cocks, J (1989) The oppositional imagination: Feminism, critique and political theory, Routledge, London.
Couzens Hoy, D & McCarthy, T (1994) Critical theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
Crotty, M (1998) The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS (eds.) (1994) The handbook of qualitative research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS (eds.) (1998) Strategies of qualitative inquiry, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Dickson, GL (1990) A feminist poststructural analysis of knowledge of menopause. Advanced Nursing Science 12(3): 15-31.
Fairclough, N (1995) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language, Longman, London.
Farber, M (1943) The foundation of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl, and the quest for a rigorous science of philosophy, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Foucault, M (1974) The archaeology of knowledge, Tavistock, London.
Foucault, M (1986) The subject and power. In Wallis, B (ed.) Art after modernism: Rethinking representation. New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York.
Gage, NL (1989) The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A 'historical' sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, October: 4-10.
Gamson, J (2000) Sexualities, queer theory, and qualitative research. In Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research, pp. 347-365. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Gavey, N (1989) Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13: 459-475.
Giddings, LS & Wood, PJ (2000) The methodological journey of a grounded theorist: An interview with Denise Dignam. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand 15(2): 4-16.
Giddings, LS & Wood, PJ (2001a) Engaging with radical hermeneutics: An interview with Margaret Southwick. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand 17(1): 4-15.
Giddings, LS & Wood, PJ (2001b) Phenomenology - Telling a story: An interview with Liz Smythe. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand 17(3): 15-26.
Glaser, BG & Strauss, AL (1967) Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, Chicago.
Greene, M (1994) Epistemology and educational research: The influence of recent approaches to knowledge. Review of Research in Education 20: 423-464.
Grossberg, L, Nelson, C & Treichler, P (eds.) (1992) Cultural studies, Routledge, New York.
Guba, EG & Lincoln,YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 105-117. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Harding, S (ed.) (1987) Feminism and methodology: Social science issues, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Janks, H (1997) Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 18(3): 329-342.
Jones, A (1993) Becoming a 'girl': Poststructuralist suggestions for educational research. Gender and Education 5(2): 157-166.
Kelly, PJ, Blacksin, B & Mason, E (2001) Factors affecting substance abuse treatment completion for women. Issues in Mental Health 22: 287-304.
Kemmis, S & McTaggart, R (eds.) (1988) The action research planner, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
Kendall, G & Wickham, G (1999) Using Foucault's methods, Sage Publications, London.
Kincheloe, JL & Mclaren, PL (1994) Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Denzin, NK and Lincoln,YS (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research, pp. 138-157. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Kuhn, T (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lather, P (1991) Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, Routledge, New York.
Lawler, J (1998) Phenomenologies as research methodologies for nursing: From philosophy to researching practice. Nursing Inquiry 5: 194-211.
Macrone, M (1994) A little knowledge: What Archimedes really meant and 80 other key ideas expanded, Ebury Press, London.
Maeve, K (1997) Nursing practice with incarcerated women: Caring with mandated (sic) alienation. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 18: 495-510.
Manias, E & Street, A (2000) Possibilities for critical social theory and Foucault's work: A toolbox approach. Nursing Inquiry 7: 50-60.
McCouat, M & Peile, C (1995) The micro politics of qualitative research traditions. Qualitative research: Beyond the boundaries, pp.2-16. Curtin University of Technology & Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Fremantle, WA.
McWilliam, E (1993) 'Post' haste: Plodding research and galloping theory. British Journal of Sociology of Education 14(2): 199-205.
McWilliam, E (1995) Educative research in initial teacher education: Postpositivist possibilities. Journal of Curriculum Studies 27(1): 55-66.
Pohatu, GH (1998) The university, Maori Studies and Treaty praxis. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Otago, Dunedin.
Polit, DF, Beck, CT & Hungler, BP (2001) Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.
Polkinghorne, D (1983) Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
Popper, K (1992/1959) The logic of scientific discovery, Routledge, London.
Powers, P (2001) The methodology of discourse analysis, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.
Reason, P (1994) Three approaches to participative learning. In Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research, pp. 324-329. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Rein, M (1983) Value critical policy analysis. In Callahan, D and Jennings, B (eds.) Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis. Plenum Press, New York.
Reinharz, S (1992) Feminist methods in social research, Oxford University Press, New York.
Robson, C (1993) Real world research, Blackwell, Oxford.
Sarantakos, S (1993) Social research, MacMillan Education, Melbourne.
Schreiber, R (1996) (Re)defining my self: Women's process of recovery from depression. Qualitative Health Research 6(4): 469-491.
Siebold, C (2000) Qualitative research from a feminist perspective in the postmodern era: Methodological, ethical and reflexive concerns. Nursing Inquiry 7: 147-155.
Small, D (1989) Participatory research: The whys and wherefores. Race, Gender, Class 8: 38-48.
Smith, LT (1999) Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, Zed Books Ltd & Otago University Press, London & Dunedin.
Smith, R (1993) Potentials for empowerment in critical education research. Australian Educational Researcher 20(2): 75-93.
Stanley, L & Wise, S (1983) Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Strauss, AL & Corbin, JM (eds.) (1997) Grounded theory in practice, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Thorne, SE, Kirkham, SR & Henderson, A (1999) Ideological implications of paradigm discourse. Nursing Inquiry 6: 123-131.
van Manen, M (1990) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy, State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y.
Webb, G (1990) Putting praxis into practice. First World Congress on Action Research. Griffith University, Brisbane.
Weedon, C (1987) Feminist practice and poststructural theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Wertheim, M (1995) Pythagoras' trousers: God, physics and the gender wars, Times Books, New York.
eContent Home
