Intermittent intravenous therapy: A comparison of two flushing solutions
References
Cyganski J, Donahue J and Heaton J (1987) The case for the heparin flush. American Journal of Nursing 87(June): 796-797.
Dean T and Ridley P (1985) Use of 0.9% sodium chloride injection without heparin for maintaining indwelling intermittent injection sites. Clinical Pharmacy 4(Sept/Oct): 488.
Epperson E (1984) Efficacy of 0.9% sodium chloride injection with and without heparin for maintaining indwelling, intermittent injection sites. Clinical Pharmacy 3(Nov/Dec): 626-629.
Ferraro J, Guanci R and Stoneburger R (1985) Use of 0.9% sodium chloride injection without heparin for maintaining indwelling, intermittent injection sites. Clinical Pharmacy 4(Sept-Oct): 488-489.
Friedman L, Furberg C and DeMets D (1985) Fundamentals of clinical trials 2nd edn. PSG Publishing, Littleton, Massachusetts.
Garrelts J, LaRocca J, Ast D, Smith D and Sweet D (1989) Comparison of heparin and 0.9% sodium chloride injection for maintaining patency of indwelling intermittent IV devices. Clinical Pharmacy 8(Jan): 34-39.
Hamilton R, Plis J, Clay C and Sylvan L (1988) Heparin sodium versus 0.9% sodium chloride injection for maintaining patency of indwelling, intermittent infusion devices. Clinical Pharmacy 8(Jun): 439-443.
Hook M (1990) Heparin v normal saline. Journal of Intravenous Nursing 13(3): 150-151.
eContent Home
